Good point, but I think it's our inability to break down good defences which is the problem

Plus we've played more games then most

Ouch!

In fairness this tends to be your default mindset. Didn't you say a couple of years ago that Pearson was killing the club and things would get worse?

Fair enough, although cas would need to score 19 tries and leeds 7 to catch us up today.



Another boring stat - I reckon our starting 17 have missed 38 games this season, that averages nearly 4 per game.

Cas 3 games in hand Leeds 2 , I'm not convinced our attack is the 3rd best in the league, especially when you look at who most of our try's was against

Didn't you say we was going under and we wouldn't even have a team

I think the point is the perception that we are clueless in attack and rely entirely on Albert Kelly to score points is not borne out by facts. If you want to bring in who we've played against so far that further weakens your argument as we've played Leeds, Cas, Wigan and Saints away, so to be one of only 3 clubs with >200 points is not too bad. Kelly has scored 3 of our 35 tries so far this year and has fewer assists than both Sneyd and Shaul.

I said we were at financial risk, which was the case (and remains so if we can't be self-sustaining). Fortunately the Faithful continued to back the club following Adam's rallying call, and with the galvanizing impact of Lee Radford here we are, back to back Wembley winners and cash in the bank from Australia. Who'd have thought it?

more shoite, do you live with Bumpy?

Which bit's untrue?

Financial risk - see the going concern note in the filed accounts

Did Adam issue a rallying call? Er, yes.

Did fans respond? I think so if season pass and merchandise sales of recent years are anything to go by

Has Lee Radford galvanized the squad since the days of Agar and Gentle? Team spirit and togetherness are consistently cited by players as a key factor in our success.

We won back to back at Wembley, right?

I think you've seen reports about the financial benefits of Australia.



No need to try and get round the swear filter. Reasoned arguments are a more mature way to respond I think.

Kelly is the only player in our squad who when attacking with ball in hand puts fear in the opposition.

Clueless attack is borne out by our inability to break down a defence in the opposition 20 despite repeat sets and relying in the main on a kick to the corner.

I've not mentioned once, Kelly been our only attacking threat . I actually think we've plenty of strike , if used correctly , I think Connor can unlock a defence as good as anyone, for me must start, Carlos is as skilfull as they come , and snyed's kicking game can be outstanding, when our forwards are on top. I'd just like to see our backs used more in midfield and and more off loads from our forwards with Shaul supporting , we do and have looked pretty obvious for sometime now . Andy doesn't really weaken my argument , if anything proves my point , we lost all 3 of the games you mentioned, our attack struggles against decent opposition, I don't really think it's an argument, I think most on here can see our attack as been pretty poor for a while now