quick question. (I am against this by the way - Not cause he is a wigan player, but because he is a waster)



What does this mean for when the next person struts snorting cocaine? Do they get to train throughout the 2 years?

Why have you got someone in mind..........?

Well done. It's nothing 99% didn't expect

Not to divert, but where does this leave our 2nd row department?



Hansen, Hoffman, Tomkins, Tuson, L. Farrell and now Hock?



Seems we have an abundance of 2nd rowers and a lack of centres.

put him in the centres

according to paper reports madge wants him as a prop... hes certainly big enough now,,and if he cuts the silly offloads out he cud be quite an handfull no?? and personally i think hocks much better than hanson anyway when on form..

how very boring.

If he was supposed to be banned from training for the two years then I would have liked to have seen him serve the entire ban. However, the anti-doping body had no problems with him resuming training.

tomkins will play centre

He was banned from training with the team or having any affiliation with any RL club. If he wanted to sort himself a personal trainer and carry on exercising, he's free to do so.

Has to return as a prop for me. We already posses an abundance of backrowers, so with his move to the frontrow, it'll provide us with strength and depth to an even greater extent.



I must say I can't wait for his return. These few months training should provide him with the time to get up to speed, and then one possibly two games in the reserves, assuming we don't desperately need him to play, and he should be right as rain.



He'll of course bring some much needed aggression to our pack also. Something I'm convinced were lacking.

No it doesn't.

The precedent had already been set with an un-named football player, so it looks as though it is a two year ban but can return to team training after 21 months.



They can do all the personal training for that 21 months if they so wish. HTH