No it doesn't need pointing out. We can tell it's a bad photoshop.



As I said on another thread, or it may have been on facetard actually, I rather fancy that Saints are unconvinced with this strip and are gauging fans reactions, before unveiling a 'safe' design that's been kept in reserve.



Or rather, I bloody hope that's the case!

Evidently alot of people haven't cottoned on to the fact that it is not necessarly a true representation of the actual shirt, even if you have





Interesting point you raise though, but I suspect it is more down to Puma, or rather their representatives at Genesis not being able to come up with a suitable design and manufacture a test version in time.

Only thing I would change is a white collar, I really like it.

Saying 'Make that V a bit thicker and we're onto a winner' shouldn't be that hard

Better with white collar. Still not my favourite.

Here's proof that less is more in kit design...

(linked from Wigan forum)







Deary deary deary deary me.



The bizarre thing about that, is that Wigan will have briefed Kooga on what kind of style they wanted, and then Kooga will have come back with 10 or so designs, and THAT one got chosen.

those shorts are mental!

It looks so much better with a white collar.

This looks a bit better (shorts hidden)

No it doesn't









The wigan away shirt is much better. The home shorts are yuk. for want of a better word.

What's all that white stuff splattered behind O'Loughlin?