You could always share with Rovers

No, HTH.



People of the town and Tescos have objected to the plans by Edinburgh house because they are both unfeasible (Tesco outline why) and would get rid of much needed town centre parking to accommodate for a Supermarket that no operator wants to use due to its size and location.



The club have nothing to do with those objections.



It's only become silly and pathetic too because you're blindly following the words of SWAG etc when in fact if you look at it clearly, RW only replied with facts that have been in the public domain for over a year, you're using this because you have nothing else to use.

As anyone got the actual wording of this letter.



I havent seen anything yet in reguards the wording.



So until i do i'll hold fire on condeming anyone.

A very sensible reply! I do hope Gronk reads this, as he seems to know everything and everyone

RW didn't makes comments in the press a couple of weeks ago against the EH development then? Sounding very much like a thinly veiled rallying call to me.



RW should have declined to comment about the development plans of a fellow RL club, end of.

Does the wording really matter, although if you read this thread back it is available.



What matters is why he even bothered to reply. He wasn't required to, considering the situation wouldn't anyone other than a mischief maker just politely decline?

Including Peter Gentle.

What the Castleford coach!

That's the man.

Exactly, unless the letter is positve about NM, which if he was approached by the NO campaigners you can safely say it isn't, then he is actively getting involved in putting a spanner in the works of wakefield.



Even if he has said something that is already public domain, he could have just not said nothing instead.

Mr vastman, as far as i know RW was asked a question and replied via this so called letter.

Who the question came from i dont know, what was in the letter i dont know.



No one as put the actual wording on this forum, we can all surmise, but no one know as of yet.



I think until we do know i think we should hang fire in name calling.

I understand your position, and usually i'd agree with you but in all honesty there is 99.9% probability that what ever he wrote wasn't to the benefit of WWRLFC, and that's probably the reason they are upset without the full facts.