|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a7137/a71376e9fc16672fdacf6fb4eed828d9f6cef26c" alt="" |
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Coach | 27039 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Aug 2005 | 20 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Sep 2017 | Sep 2017 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote Tricky2309="Tricky2309"Reading on here it is clear that those with any sense who can afford to take up the share offer, are not going to until the club comes totally clean about everything and answers the many valid questions raised and yet unanswered.
The synic in me is starting to think that the lack of detail in writing around this whole share offer is due to the fact that there is more to it then meets the eye. Having seen many half-truths emerge from the club over the years, the only way I would consider buying any is if the following was all provided in writing :
(1) Assurance that the current BOD would not have anything to do with the club going forward
(2) Assurance that the money is going into an Escrow account, all we have at the moment is verbal confirmation and being asked to make cheques payable to a firm of accountants that I don't know from Adam
(3) Assurance that none of the funds will be used to repay Directors loans
(4) Assurance that none of the Directors will be able to profit if and when the remaining proceeds from the sale of Belle Vue are realised
(5) Full disclosure on the true debts the club have (including who they are owed to and what period they relate to)
(6) Details of any money that has been taken out of the club over the last 5 years by Ted & Co
(7) Details of what amount the BOD are to be donating to the cause (a total figure will suffice) and confirmation that they will not be taking any shares (or at least donating them along with the other shares they already hold)
Sadly, I doubt anyone at the club is capable of/willing to provide these answers.
Consequently, I think we need to get fully behind the supporters trust and let Sandal Cat know what amounts we are willing to pledge, then we can hopefully have enough to look to buy the club back if it goes into admin. I prefer the Supporters Trust route anyway, because at the moment I believe the share request with a minimum of a grand leaves some of our fans on the outside looking in, and thats not right, everyone should be able to contribute what they want are able to. Plus I am far more willing to trust my fellow supporters than anything that the current BOD are responsible for putting together'"
Would be the right thing to do and come clean, it won't happen on a few points you have and i think we all know that.
Some of the questions could be covered at the meeting but i doubt the Trust can cover/give all the answers needed at this stage, some you'll never get answers to i'm afraid, still at least it offers some hope and we clearly need some of that.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 4130 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Aug 2007 | 18 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Dec 2024 | Apr 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| who gets the rest of the ground money if we move, now does his lordship.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 4130 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Aug 2007 | 18 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Dec 2024 | Apr 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| it is everybodys choice but do not leave ted with anything left of this club, if we are so much on our knees,why 50%. we would be better in administration then hed got nothing and he wouldnt get a golden handshake. its not our duty to save our club but its a chance to get rid of this lot, who dont even have the decency to say sorry for their actions of running the club into the ground. he will not walk away and sometime in the future it will come back and bite you. DONT DO IT for the long term good of the club.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Chairman | 5392 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Dec 2001 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 1970 | Jun 2022 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote MOPSEY LIVES ON="MOPSEY LIVES ON"it is everybodys choice but do not leave ted with anything left of this club, if we are so much on our knees,why 50%. we would be better in administration then hed got nothing and he wouldnt get a golden handshake. its not our duty to save our club but its a chance to get rid of this lot, who dont even have the decency to say sorry for their actions of running the club into the ground. he will not walk away and sometime in the future it will come back and bite you. DONT DO IT for the long term good of the club.'"
I didn't know Ted wanted anything more from the club. He's pretty much said he'll hand it over, lock, stock and barrel, if people can come up with the money. No golden handshake, no nothing. Just a barage of abuse for overseeing the whole screw-up.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 100 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2009 | 16 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 2012 | Jan 2012 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Tricky well said, what a sick joke this whole situation is. There are so many unanswered questions and nonsense statement being forward to the supporters - no sensible person will put the cash into the proposal.
Goodbye Richardson family and all your cohorts, do the decent thing and leave voluntarily, if this is your last throw of the dice it's a poor one and all you are showing is your contempt for the intelligence of the supporters.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 17 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jan 2011 | 14 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Mar 2018 | Apr 2011 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote but now it looks as though the ship may be sinking he is joining the queue for one last payoff before he rides off into the sunset. You must all be so caerful of what you do over the next 3 weeks as it is now looking much more likely that there is so much more to all this than meets the eye.'"
When I read this I leapt to another conclusion, and it is only a guess. SRW may be setting up for the administration period. If the share thing doesn't work then the club may go into administration, with the money SRW gave being a loan rather than a donation this means he'll be one of the major debtors who get to vote on the terms of the administration. This potentially could be what he's doing, essentially buying a %age of the votes at the later stage.
oh, and hello by the way... I'm a cas supporter but wanted to keep up with all the goings on a Trin - and registered because when I read that about Rodney Walker it made me think of the goings on at Leeds United a few years back.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Chairman | 5392 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Dec 2001 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 1970 | Jun 2022 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote Tricky2309="Tricky2309"Reading on here it is clear that those with any sense who can afford to take up the share offer, are not going to until the club comes totally clean about everything and answers the many valid questions raised and yet unanswered.
The synic in me is starting to think that the lack of detail in writing around this whole share offer is due to the fact that there is more to it then meets the eye. Having seen many half-truths emerge from the club over the years, the only way I would consider buying any is if the following was all provided in writing :
(1) Assurance that the current BOD would not have anything to do with the club going forward
(2) Assurance that the money is going into an Escrow account, all we have at the moment is verbal confirmation and being asked to make cheques payable to a firm of accountants that I don't know from Adam
(3) Assurance that none of the funds will be used to repay Directors loans
(4) Assurance that none of the Directors will be able to profit if and when the remaining proceeds from the sale of Belle Vue are realised
(5) Full disclosure on the true debts the club have (including who they are owed to and what period they relate to)
(6) Details of any money that has been taken out of the club over the last 5 years by Ted & Co
(7) Details of what amount the BOD are to be donating to the cause (a total figure will suffice) and confirmation that they will not be taking any shares (or at least donating them along with the other shares they already hold)
Sadly, I doubt anyone at the club is capable of/willing to provide these answers.
Consequently, I think we need to get fully behind the supporters trust and let Sandal Cat know what amounts we are willing to pledge, then we can hopefully have enough to look to buy the club back if it goes into admin. I prefer the Supporters Trust route anyway, because at the moment =#FF0000I believe the share request with a minimum of a grand leaves some of our fans on the outside looking in, and thats not right, everyone should be able to contribute what they want are able to. Plus I am far more willing to trust my fellow supporters than anything that the current BOD are responsible for putting together'"
this is what angered me and then to read on a club statement how much do you want your club to survive data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8cfb2/8cfb200db08b7d1ae033686837d29848fb8c8859" alt="Sad icon_sad.gif"
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 17 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jan 2011 | 14 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Mar 2018 | Apr 2011 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Here's an odd proposition for you... (sorry by the way, the Rodney Walker thing is fresh in my mind and I'm trying to get my head around possible scenarios)
Rodney Walker donates 165000 to Wakefield to pay the tax bill, upon the share thing being announced it gets turned into a loan - If 500000 is raised to own 50% of the club, then this effectively values the club at 1 million. Rodney Walker does not then take the cash out of the club but instead converts that loan into shares and at no further cost to himself he gets 16.5% of the company.
I'll stop now
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Owner | 7665 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Oct 2003 | 21 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Feb 2025 | Jun 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Maybe there could be options explored on the 18th regarding a fighting fund?
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 6310 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jan 2007 | 18 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Feb 2025 | Feb 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Here's a thought.
If we accept the reality that the RFL are not going to give us a franchise, we will be a National League side next year. In which case, wouldn't £500K be much better put behind a National League team. It would go a lot further, might help us win something (which we have to do to get back into the top flight again), by which time hopefully Newmarket will be sorted and the future will look brighter.
So is the solution to go into administration, drop down, get a fighting fund for down there and so do more with it?
Perhaps someone with knowledge of company law can provide some info though, because my understanding of the Crusaders situation is that they went into administration, which of itself doesn't cleanse the debts, I think. All it does, I think, is ring-fence the assets as the administrator tries to come to agreements with creditors to sort out the debts. The Crusaders company then went bust (which is different to administration), and the new Crusaders company was set up in its place. In our case, would administration work, ie, the HMRC is not going to go away, and so we would have to do what the Crusaders did, and go bust and restart as a new limited company. But the principal asset related to our club, Belle Vue, is owned by someone else, with a payment pending on that, and so how would that work? The new club would not be allowed to say "give the money to us instead", I assume, as the money would be payable to the old company, not the new one.
What I'm trying to get round to is what would happen to Belle Vue? Would the buyer get it by default and we would have to come to a rental arrangement, and did the Crusaders avoid the tax and old debts not by going into administration, but by going bust?
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Owner | 7665 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Oct 2003 | 21 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Feb 2025 | Jun 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| It's my opinion that we should continue to fight for our super league status to the very last second, we fought really hard to win promotion into this division and even then we have to kick the door down to obtain access. Once in, we had to operate without super league funding for a period of time and have then battled against the odds to retain our place.
There are no guarantees!
If we drop a division and then over the next three years we win grand finals, get the new stadium built, create a solid financial foundation and tick all the other boxes we may still be denied a super league franchise in 2015 because of the geographical location of the club.
It's my suspicion that this is what was said to the potential investor who walked away after his meeting with the Rugby football league.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Owner | 7665 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Oct 2003 | 21 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Feb 2025 | Jun 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| =#0000BF[size=150Faith Hope and Trinity[/size
In the absence of all the relevant details, which have quite reasonably been requested by a number of the club's supporters on this forum, it might help to try and summarise what we do know and what we can confirm as fact.
The shareholding offer, whilst publicised by the club will not be controlled by the club and neither will the money
Investments/donations will be paid into an ESCROW account which is secure from access by anyone from the club, the board of directors etc
Andrew Wright & Co, while acting as the club's solicitors are not under the employ of the club or the board of directors. They are a long-established firm of accountants whose impartiality in this matter can be relied upon
Any money paid into the ESCROW account will be refundable to each and every investor until such a time as the new shareholders decide how best to use the funds for the benefit of the club. That decision could be a number of things but the most likely are:
* Pay the club's immediate debt to HMRC
* Leave the money in the ESCROW account until further clarity is established
* Refund the money to each individual investor if that is what they wish
* In the event of the club entering Administration the funds could be used to purchase the club from the Administrator
* Use the money as a fighting fund to help rebuild the club along with any new investor
The vitally important thing to remember is that it is you/us/the supporters who will decide what happens with the money
What is clear is that if no such fund exists we as supporters will have no choices to make, no influence to bear and we will have to sit by and watch OUR club be torn apart
Ted has indicated publicly that, in the event that the £500,000 is raised, he will transfer his shares probably to the Supporters Trust
Finally!
please do not see this as a mechanism to bail out the current board of directors
Change at the top is now an inevitability, either through a positive outcome of the shareholding or because of Administration!
[size=150=#FF0000Do you want to have a saydata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a7137/a71376e9fc16672fdacf6fb4eed828d9f6cef26c" alt="/size
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 6310 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jan 2007 | 18 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Feb 2025 | Feb 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| I think the options are more limited than that. There are two options available:
1. Monies raised are used to pay off HMRC.
2. It isn't and we go bust.
In relation to option 2, that is when the other choices kick in;ie, do people want their money back or is it used as a fighting fund for the new company.
In relation to the first option, and this is where the lack of information is frustrating, the worry is that we save the club on 31st January but then get another big bill on 31st July, we have no money to pay it, and we go bust. No 500k fighting fund for the new company.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Owner | 7665 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Oct 2003 | 21 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Feb 2025 | Jun 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote Slugger McBatt="Slugger McBatt"I think the options are more limited than that. There are two options available:
1. Monies raised are used to pay off HMRC.
2. It isn't and we go bust.
In relation to option 2, that is when the other choices kick in;ie, do people want their money back or is it used as a fighting fund for the new company.
In relation to the first option, and this is where the lack of information is frustrating, the worry is that we save the club on 31st January but then get another big bill on 31st July, we have no money to pay it, and we go bust. No 500k fighting fund for the new company.'"
before we go to the supporters trust meeting on the 18th we hope to fill some of the information gaps and get some assurances about the club's position going forward
|
|
|
![" |
|