16/1 with fred done. (betfred)

he ruled himsself out good ridence

Yeah right, but lets blame Ted - hell it couldn't be Danny he's always been a beacon of common sense and professionalism hasn't he





I suggest we all move on, no need to take sides as JK says these things happen.

Come on guys n gals brough was never gonna play if he got injured then all the negotiation means nothing if he of had a bad game and contributed to a loss we would off cried foul.



danny's gone, long live obst

When things like this happen there always four versions as to what happened. In this case there is Danny Brough's version, Wakefield's version, Huddersfield's version and there is the truth. People have quoted what they have been told or have heard, but unless they have been party to the whole process they cannot quote what they know as gospel. As it goes Brough will soon be another clubs problem, so let's just move on.

=#FF0000ONE AND ONLY WARNING , THIS BOARD CAN NOT SUSTAIN ALLEGATIONS OF THAT MAGNITUDE .





MUTLEY CAT

Ah well - he's gone now. Played very well for us most of the time, got the feeling he wasn't the easiest charicture to manage and possibly had a negative effect on those around him more than you would like. That said, it was probably that side of him that made him the player he was for us - take away that take away his edge maybe.



He's followed the money in a short career, you can't blame him for that - but as somebody mentioned earlier he appears to have shown a distinct lack of class in the whole saga. We've lost better than him in the past and will lose better than him in the future and we will get over it.

has he gone then officially?

no,heard on radio that the problem is thst we cant agree tearms with kirmond

I am not sure about this LOANING of a Hudds player. I'd prefer money or a perm deal if possible.



We're trying to build our own team, not get another teams player fit and full of confidence - For example Dave Halley.

I know somebody within the Giants and they asured me Kirmond is still in Nathan Browns plans for the future,Weird if so as he signed a new 4 year deal not so long ago.



Again as somebody else said I have heard the player mentioned was Greg McNally?



Also heard along the grapevine that nots all straight forward with why Mr.Brough is out of favour at the minute and its nothing to do with rugby.

Too true.