www.smart-space.co.uk/building-i ... ssion.html www.astructures.co.uk/planning-p ... ldings.php Seems to me if the temporary structure is to be used for over 28 days then PP is required. Happy to be proved wrong. As an aside, the hospitality block is by nature a temporary structure and I remember the local councillor complaining about it. Did the club get PP for that?

www.smart-space.co.uk/building-i ... ssion.html www.astructures.co.uk/planning-p ... ldings.php Seems to me if the temporary structure is to be used for over 28 days then PP is required. Happy to be proved wrong. As an aside, the hospitality block is by nature a temporary structure and I remember the local councillor complaining about it. Did the club get PP for that?

This only applies if they are temporary,but it wasn't mentioned last night.

Would imagine if they are proper stands PP would be required.

Can't believe you think the North Stand offers the best view in SL. The terracing rises at such a narrow angle that more than 10 rows back you can't see the deadball line and by half way up you're miles from the pitch with no chance of seeing any in-goal action. It's gonna take one hell of a roof to cover it.

By the sounds of it, it’s a completely new structure with the old bank getting demolished.

Good point, baring in mind i think the idea is to start with new concrete, a steeper gradiant and higher step may be in order.

Just because you can't see every nook & crannie doesn't make it a bad view.

My understanding is that planning permission was granted a number of years ago, but the work was never done; am I making that up?

I thought we wanted to, but faced objections from the local councillor about the detrimental effect this would have on the quality of life for local residents.

I thought it had been given the go-ahead, but I could be wrong; it would of course be criminal to impinge on the leafy idyll that is Agbrigg.



Either way - is it even possible that AG and his team would 'forget' the small matter of planning? I very much doubt that, so for now I'll assume that it's been dealt with, one way or the other. I am sure that details will follow.

If it came from Ted it probably wasn't true anyway.

Planning permission expires, so if it was more than 3/5 years ago it would need another application.

Hopefully if PP is needed it has already been submitted,if not it could be squeaky bum time again and in good old Trinity tradition another knock back,but in AG I think we have the club in good hands,so hopefully everything has been taken into account and dealt with accordingly.