your line defence can be as good as it wants, but getting over the line once with a 15-5 penalty count is frankly pitiful,



Hull KR looked no threat whatsoever going forward against a team which was losing players, not starting at full strength, and getting caned in the penalty count



if you switch those penalty counts around, Leeds would have put 30 on you



i would expect any team, challenging for the playoffs, to win any game they have a 10 clear penalty advantage

I agree, but we hardly had a prolific attack last year. It hasn't got any worse and I honestly think we'll see an improvement when we aren't playing teams like the mighty Leeds. My point was that our defence is considerably better than last year which makes us better than we were last year.

not if you are offering less going forward,

Did you actually read all of my post?

yes i just disagree with you,



i thought hkr were poor, so were we, i think most teams in sl would have fancied thier chances against that performance

How can you say Leeds were missing Eastwood? He's never played for them





I also don't take in to account that they missed Buderus either, how many minutes has he played for them? Hardly a regular.

Or as my father in law said in his text to me 'thats why we're champions'

They are part of the squad though, they were recruited for the 2009 season so if they don't play they are missing.

Buderus yes but certainly not in the case of Eastwood.

They planned to have him, therefore as he is not here they are not weaker as a result, same with Crocker/FC etc.



Had they known he could not get a visa they would have made another signing, so right now they are missing a player.

All the players I mentioned would be in the first team if fit and available



Not sure what you are getting at?

Has Eastwood been part of Leeds matchday plans/tactics for their 3 games this season?