Quote rhinoms="rhinoms"5th paragraph from the bottom. www.yorkshireeveningpost.co.uk/l ... 6558092.jp '" The 5th paragraph from the bottom is not a quote from the CEO now is it. When discussing what the CEO has and hasn't said perhaps it'd be a good idea to focus on the bit between the speech marks rather than what the reporter pads the report out with.

Quote rhinoms="rhinoms"5th paragraph from the bottom. www.yorkshireeveningpost.co.uk/l ... 6558092.jp '" The 5th paragraph from the bottom is not a quote from the CEO now is it. When discussing what the CEO has and hasn't said perhaps it'd be a good idea to focus on the bit between the speech marks rather than what the reporter pads the report out with.

It still covers quite clearly that Scott Donald has been replaced in the 20 man elite squad by Lee Smith like i said and yet you chose to publish 1 sentence that in isolation implies his departure isn't significant or worth a mention.

We both know why you chose to quote that 1 sentence and we also know how you don't rate Donald and like i said a bit of mischief on your part by implying his departure was'nt worth a mention or significant squad wise.

?????

The one sentence I referred to was something =#FF0000the CEO actually said and is entirely relevant and unambiguous.



You can try and find loopholes and quote the YEP reporter if you like but it doesn't alter the fact that Gary Hetherington said that Greg Eastwood was the only notable departure and guess what (so far) he's right, IMO although clearly not in yours.

It's only relevant to THIS thread if you use it in isolation to imply that CEO does'nt see Donald as a notable departure which in this case you have.

Like i said the article shows that Donald is replaced in the squad by Smiths return and the mention of Eastwood by the CEO as the only notable departure is because he has yet to be replaced.

And he's right about Stevo.



Stevo "has lost the plot" IMO, he is obsessed with minor rule infringements and overreacts to anything resembling a foul (irony of ironies from a 1970's hooker). Time for a change there.

the whole set up needs sorting. eddie is a good studio host but sh*te commentator. stevo is a joke and clarke is a rambling lancashire biased idiot.



dave woods should be the commentator and someone like iestyn harris would be a great co-commentator

It's a shame Scott let himself down with his one eyed comments in the YEP today. Unnecessary and blinkered.

How tedious you are.

Personally, I totally agree with scotty, Phil Clarkes comments were out of order, to say that a player should be punished with a major injury for a minor infringement is wrong especially from some one who's career was ended with a broken neck. And all sky commentary is biased, can't stand it.



Well Said Scott, and good luck, a leeds legend.

I see Pinocchio's still out trawling

He does have a point about the quality of the commentary team....even my Southern rooted wife who knows very little about the game often remarks the style is similar to the guys who used to present it's a knockout. She enjoys the skill speed and tries but is bemused by the inane ramblings.



Makes you wonder whether the Rugby Union hierarchy walk the corridors of power within Sky as well as the BBC..... Keeping the upstart game still firmly in its place.